Posts

shape of United States filled in with American flag on striped background with words national news

No More Homecoming King and Queen at Penn State

Penn State University is doing away with the terms “Homecoming King” and “Homecoming Queen” because they aren’t “inclusive.” Instead, the school will crown two students of any gender persuasion with the more generic “Guide State Forward Award,” according to new rules from the Penn State Homecoming Executive Court and Royalty Committee.

As for the new homecoming court, 10 people who “capture the essence of the values [Penn State] hold[s] true as a university will be chosen, regardless of their gender, gender identity, and/or gender expression.”

Penn State’s student-run Daily Collegian conducted a poll, and so far, most disagree with the change. Of those 1,352 who took the poll, just 329 respondents voted that they agreed with the change, while 1,023 respondents disagreed.

News Sources:

NOTE: FACT provides links to external websites for educational purposes only. The inclusion of any links to other websites does not necessarily constitute an endorsement.

Get News Stories in Your Inbox Every Week

Get more news snapshots like this one by subscribing to our weekly Five Minutes for Families email!

shape of United States filled in with American flag on striped background with words national news

‘Transgenders’ Eye Advancements in Fertility Preservation

In the past, those confused about their biological sex who wanted to “transition” to a new “gender identity” through hormone therapy and surgeries had to balance the likely loss of biological fertility with their desire to have biological children in the future. But that isn’t the case anymore.

Diane Chen, a pediatric psychologist with the Gender and Sex Development Program at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, is utilizing assisted reproductive technologies that first preserved fertility for pediatric cancer patients for her “transgender” patients. Thirteen out of 105 transgender adolescents treated at Lurie from 2013 to 2016 decided to have their sperm or eggs frozen.

And in 2015, the ethics committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommended fertility preservation options be offered to all patients before a “gender transition.”

For now, these procedures are costly and often not covered by insurance. Regardless of the cost, consider the ethical and legal implications of a “transgender male” who expressed the possibility he would marry and “his wife will carry the eggs he saved in her womb.”

News Source:

NOTE: FACT provides links to external websites for educational purposes only. The inclusion of any links to other websites does not necessarily constitute an endorsement.

Get News Stories in Your Inbox Every Week

Get more news snapshots like this one by subscribing to our weekly Five Minutes for Families email!

silhouette of a head with puzzle piece missing with TN Capitol in the background

Tennessee Legislation Demonstrates Why Liberals Are ‘Mentally Unstable’

I sat in a Tennessee Senate Committee hearing two weeks ago, listening in one ear to a debate over “child marriage” while listening through the earphone in my other ear to a House Committee meeting in which the issue of gender identity vis-a-vis biological sex in locker rooms was debated. It struck me a few days later just how the arguments by liberals on both bills were both irreconcilable and perfectly reconcilable. How could they be both?

How Were the Arguments Irreconcilable?

In the Senate, liberals1 argued that the law should not discriminate in the assigned usage by minors of locker rooms and bathrooms relative to gender and that objective phenomenon like biological sex must always give way to subjective psychological phenomenon.

On the other hand, in the House, liberals reversed the argument. They argued that the law should discriminate between 17- and 18-years-olds in the licensing of marriages and that objective chronological age must always give way to the more subjective criteria of maturity. Some mother, married at the age of 17, was more mature in regard to marriage than Zsa Zsa Gabor with her nine marriages ever was!

I won’t take time to explain how a believer in the transcendent Creator God of Scripture could reconcile opposing arguments of the liberals in both cases, for that is not my point. The point, today, is that the second argument demonstrates that liberals are not, in fact, against all discrimination in the law. They really know that law, by definition, “discriminates” between one type of conduct and another or between one person or another, though they try their best to suppress that knowledge when they want to do something the law prohibits (of course, by “discriminating” against them).

Upon What Basis Will We Engage in Necessary Discrimination?

So the question isn’t whether we should or should not discriminate or whether the law should or should not discriminate. Rather, the question is this: On what basis should we discriminate? How shall we decide between those discriminating judgments that are either good or worth tolerating and those that are bad and should not be tolerated?

This is a question for which liberals who deny God or the existence of any pre-political, pre-governmental law by which human laws can be measured are at a complete loss.
It’s not that they don’t give answers to that question; it is just that, based on their premise of autonomous human beings, they cannot provide a basis upon which to judge the rightness of the various answers. Their whole premise is that there is nothing outside the individual person by which the ideas of the individual person can be judged.

The most commonly accepted answer among liberals is pragmatism—what is best for the most number of people. That answer is great if you are among the larger number of people and not so great if you are in the minority.

And, of course, those enlightened liberals who believe in the sovereignty of man’s reason know that arguments based on authority, popularity, and the like rest on logical fallacies. They are logical fallacies because, absent other evidence, a belief that what is best for the most number of people in a particular situation is just as likely to be false as true.

How Liberals Reconcile the Otherwise Irreconcilable

And therein is the ground upon which I could say that liberals’ arguments in these two situations are reconcilable—their denial of objective truth.

When we deny that there is any objective truth imposed on us or to which we are subject, then we can do and say and think whatever we want. We can be as illogical and irrational as we want to be.

Better yet, no one can say we should not think irrationally or illogically. For that would be a real rule, and the liberal denies the existence of real rules. To be consistent, liberals must say we are free from the rule that reason or logic should be the rule!

The Real Reason Liberals Can’t Insist on Reason and Logic

Here, though, is the problem liberals face. If they allow room for just those two transcendent, imposed rules of determination—rationality and logic—then they have cracked open the door of the vault in which they have locked away God.

Transcendent, imposed rules can only come from a transcendent Creator God, and we are subject to those transcendent, imposed rules only if we are His creatures. But if that’s the case in these two instances, then we are subject to our Creator in all instances for we are, at all times, creatures.

This is a thought too horrible for the liberal. But here is the really horrible thought that the liberal ignores: He or she is, by definition, mentally unstable, for his or her thinking rests on nothing stable.

I think the Apostle Paul put it this way: “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools” (Romans 1:22).

NOTES

  1. I use the term liberals to refer to the post-modern person who denies that there is any transcendent Creator or any metanarrative that explains reality and the course or direction of history. I do not use Democrat or Republican because those labels are meaningless when liberalism is defined the way I’ve used it. Many elected Republicans are liberals, as so defined, who don’t realize they are liberals or are simply afraid to fully embrace their liberalism because it brings particular results they don’t like.

David Fowler served in the Tennessee state Senate for 12 years before joining FACT as President in 2006. Read David’s complete bio.

FACT-RSS-Blog-Icon-small Get David Fowler’s Blog as a feed.

Invite David Fowler to speak at your event

shape of United States filled in with American flag on striped background with words national news

Idaho Judge Offers ‘Transgender’ Ability to Amend Birth Certificates

U.S. Magistrate Judge Candy W. Dale recently ruled that rules by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare prohibiting “transgenders” from amending their birth certificates to reflect their “gender identity” violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment.

Judge Dale gave the state the deadline of April 6 to begin accepting applications for amended birth certificates.

Not content with merely striking down the rule, the judge also encroached on the state Legislature’s authority by ruling that the amended birth certificate cannot contain a notation that it was changed.

News Sources:

NOTE: FACT provides links to external websites for educational purposes only. The inclusion of any links to other websites does not necessarily constitute an endorsement.

Get News Stories in Your Inbox Every Week

Get more news snapshots like this one by subscribing to our weekly Five Minutes for Families email!

shape of United States filled in with American flag on striped background with words national news

Kansas Republican Party Votes for Biblical View of Sexuality

The Kansas Republican Party earlier this month approved a resolution submitted by Eric Teetsel of the Family Policy Alliance of Kansas, who is also a member of the party state committee, which sought to clarify the party’s position on “gender identity.”

The resolution, which you can read on Facebook, explains that the party rejects “transgenderism” and the concept of “gender identity” in favor of biological sex, rejects sex reassignment surgery or transitioning hormones, seeks to give parents back the right to guide their child’s education, and protects student privacy and protection in school bathrooms and locker rooms.

“I felt a burden to give the other side of the story and to make the case for human sexual identity rooted not just in good theology but in good science,” Teetsel told CBN News.

News Sources:

NOTE: FACT provides links to external websites for educational purposes only. The inclusion of any links to other websites does not necessarily constitute an endorsement.

Get News Stories in Your Inbox Every Week

Get more news snapshots like this one by subscribing to our weekly Five Minutes for Families email!